Mediation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Second ApplicationMediation may even address some of the more general problems in BiH. Studies show that mediation can improve access to justice in a variety of ways. Mediation can help poorer segments of society participate in conflict resolution where they might not have been able to afford an attorney for traditional litigation.81 Mediation can take place in rural areas or areas not served by a courthouse.82 It can occur on weekends or evenings so that participants do not have to take time off of work. A proposed EU Directive promoting mediation in civil and commercial matters identifies its primary objective as ensuring better access to justice.83 Mediation’s generally informal nature may also appear less intimidating to people who view the government with suspicion or fear.84 Mediation may improve citizens’ attitudes towards the BiH judicial system in general. As mentioned, studies show that the BiH judicial system is currently held in very low regard by the population.85 Mediation’s emphasis on party-centered decision-making provides better opportunities for parties to resolve cases in a manner consistent with their interests. Since resolutions are voluntary, mediation eliminates the inherent coercion that a court judgment entails. Studies show that mediation tends to have a very high user satisfaction rate. 86 As a result, mediation parties will view the general judicial system more positively, which should improve the rule of law. Mediation might actually help strengthen democracy. In several cases, mediation has played a role in preparing community leaders, increasing civic engagement, and developing public processes that facilitate restructuring and social change. In South Africa, for instance, mediation programs helped prepare the country for a peaceful transition out of the apartheid era.87 There, an NGO called the Independent Mediation Services of South Africa began mediating labor disputes in the 1980s.88 The program was very successful by conventional measures, but the most interesting aspect was its impact on social change. It is credited with developing and training community leaders who went on to hold significant positions in the post-apartheid governments.89 It is reported that “their mediation training and experiences helped develop skills in consensual approaches to problem-solving and policy development.”90 At the end of the transition negotiations, the lead National Party negotiator indicated that “the success of the negotiations and the success of the [various mediation services] helped redirect the country from a culture of violence to a culture of negotiation.”91 Reports also indicate that mediation programs in the Philippines and Ukraine are helping to build an ethic of civil engagement.92 Perhaps, mediation can strengthen democracy in BiH. Under the control of communism, BiH citizens were not accustomed to taking personal responsibility for decisions.93 Furthermore, they were not experienced in the art of compromise. Citizens had the choice of acquiescence in governmental action or protest.94 In the event that one decided to protest, one usually became a dissident and had to be an “uncompromising absolutist.”95 As a result, many of the democrats” in post-communist societies have found the transition from an authoritarian system to a compromise-based democracy difficult.96 The use of mediation (with appropriate training) might help build a needed culture of compromise.97 Both parties and representatives might begin to explore non-confrontational ways to address conflicts and begin to take personal responsibility for resolving them.98 This is especially crucial for BiH given the fact that ethnic tensions remain and compromise on these issues is of paramount importance to the survival of the state.99 While it is impossible to predict with precision the kind of impact mediation might have on BiH’s fractured society, the foregoing suggests that, given sufficient time and resources, a well-conceived program might promote consensual approaches to problem solving and public policy debate, thereby strengthening this post-conflict, nascent democracy.
81. ADR Guide, supra note
71, at 13, app. B. Sri Lanka Case Study, Bangladesh Case Study. back Peter V. Baugher,
President |