Ethical Rules for International Arbitrators - 5Ramon Mullerat OBE7. Independence and impartiality of the party-appointed arbitratorDepending on the arbitral rules selected, a significant difference may exist between the role of party-appointed arbitrators in the US and elsewhere. While leading arbitral organisations outside the US require that party-appointed arbitrators be independent and impartial (art. 7 ICC Rules of Arbitration, art. 5.2 Rules LCIA, Model Rules UNCITRAL, etc.), certain US arbitral rules and laws permit party-appointed arbitrators to serve as non-neutral partisans (A A A Commercial Arbitration Rules, also the case law interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act, etc.). In the US, a party-nominated arbitrator was historically not obliged to satisfy the same standards of independence and impartiality that were imposed on non party-appointed arbitrators. Code Canon VII of the ABA/AAA permits arbitrators to: a) be "predisposed" towards the appointing party; and b) have communications with the appointing party subject only to a general obligation to "act in good faith and with integrity and fairness. "Canon, VII. Ethical considerations relating to arbitrators appointed by one party Canon VII describes the ethical obligations that nonneutral party-appointed arbitrators should observe and those that are nol applicable to them. But the trend in contemporary international arbitration is strongly towards a uniform set of standards of independence and impartiality for all members of the tribunal 15. Today, the general opinion is that all arbitrators, including ex parte arbitrators, should be fully independent and impartial 16. An arbitrator that has powers similar to those of a judge, and sometimes even broader, should be absolutely independent and impartial in respect to both of the parties 17 18. All arbitrators, including party-appointed arbitrators must respect the same ethical duties, which must apply to all of them without distinction. In order to protect the independence and impartiality of party-appointed arbitrators, some solutions have been envisaged. For example, the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution, in their revised rules (Rule 5.4 d) provides for an optional "screened" selection of party appointed arbitrators designed "in such a manner so that the arbitrators wouldn't know who picked them"19.
15 Gary B. Born, International Commercial Arbitration in the United States. Klubcr, 1994, p. 64. back
Peter V. Baugher,
President |